Porsche 968
Due to a thin data state, this market read for the Porsche 968 is low-confidence. Signals indicate an appreciation momentum of 63.08 and a speculation opportunity of 62.8, alongside liquidity at 41.37 and depreciation risk at 41.74. A volatile regime is anticipated, with an "up" direction forecast over the next 6 to 24 months at a 0.49 probability, and the High-Yield Bond Spread is the strongest leading indicator with a -0.6 correlation over 21 months.
What It's Actually Worth
Blended value of a standard 31 yr, 83k mi example, ~$26.5K now. The green line weighs confirmed auction sales most heavily (the amber dots — what cars actually hammered for), blends in fast-selling "just-missed" listings, and lightly smooths out month-to-month composition noise.
Did our model work? 55% direction calls right
Each faint amber line is a forecast we would have made at that point in the past (12-mo horizon), drawn against what actually happened (blue). Over 62 scored forecasts: 55% got the direction right, median value error ±35%.
Walk-forward: each ghost uses only data available at that date — no hindsight. Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.
Auction Scorecard gavel in range 6 in 10
We replayed 250 past auctions in this market — predicting each hammer price from market data before the sale (no hindsight). Typical miss: ±32%; the gavel landed inside our predicted range 6 in 10 of the time, and we lean slightly high on average.
| Sold | Car | Our range | Hammer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | 1994 · 44k mi | $19.9K–$44.0K | $40.3K | ✓ |
| 2026-08-05 | 1994 · 72k mi | $18.3K–$40.5K | $11.0K | ✗ |
| 2026-07-30 | 1993 · 63k mi | $18.6K–$41.1K | $25.8K | ✓ |
| 2026-07-25 | 1992 · 71k mi | $17.7K–$39.2K | $50.0K | ✗ |
| 2026-07-19 | 1993 · 157k mi | $11.0K–$24.3K | $30.0K | ✗ |
| 2026-07-16 | 1995 · 74k mi | $17.3K–$38.2K | $27.0K | ✓ |
| 2026-06-12 | 1995 · 89k mi | $15.9K–$35.2K | $49.0K | ✗ |
| 2026-05-26 | 1994 · 48k mi | $19.6K–$43.3K | $18.3K | ✗ |
Live now — calling it before the gavel
We're currently tracking 8 open auctions in this market. Here's our predicted hammer range for each — check back after they close.
| Closes | Car | Source | Our predicted range |
|---|---|---|---|
| open | 1994 · 120k mi | BaT | $12.3K–$34.9K ($20.7K) |
| open | 1993 · 7k mi | BaT | $27.2K–$77.3K ($45.9K) |
| open | 1993 · 156k mi | BaT | $10.5K–$29.9K ($17.7K) |
| open | 1994 · 46k mi | classic | $21.6K–$61.0K ($36.3K) |
| open | 1995 · 93k mi | classic | $17.4K–$49.1K ($29.3K) |
| open | 1993 · 45k mi | classic | $20.9K–$59.0K ($35.1K) |
| open | 1994 · 75k mi | classic | $19.8K–$55.8K ($33.2K) |
| open | 1993 · 26k mi | classic | $23.3K–$65.4K ($39.0K) |
No-lookahead: predictions are made before each auction closes; the scorecard grades confirmed sold auctions only (no-sales excluded). A modeled estimate, not a guarantee. Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.
Where We Think It's Headed
Probability and range, not a single number. Wider = less certain (not bigger gains).
| Horizon | Direction | Probability | Confidence | Past accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 mo | UP | 49% | Low | 56% |
| 12 mo | UP | 49% | Low | 55% |
| 24 mo | UP | 49% | Low | 60% |
Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.
Lead Indicator Forecast
Some indicators move before this market does. High-Yield Bond Spread has historically led it by about 6 months — so its recent move implies where prices head next (dashed). The solid green line is actual value through today; the shaded path is what the lead implies.
Crystal Ball — What Leading Indicators Signal
Distinct from the trend forecast above: this blends all 8 leading indicators (each at its own lead time, de-duplicated so correlated ones don't double-count) into one signal. Leading indicators are collectively signaling higher over the next ~12 months (moderate conviction — 56% of weighted drivers agree), driven mainly by LVMH (luxury proxy ADR) and 30-Year Mortgage Rate, though Trade-Weighted Dollar Index points the other way.
Are the indicators agreeing?
Each bar is one driver's current push; longer = more weight. All one side = high conviction; split = low.
If You’d Bought in 2013
$100K invested 2013-01 → today (13.6 yrs), this car vs where else you could've put the money. Rebased to 100 at the start; the dashed line is inflation (break-even).
What This Market Follows
Specialty-car prices don't move in a vacuum. These economic indicators have historically led this market — tap one to see it shifted forward by its lead time, overlaid on the value line.
High-Yield Bond Spread leads by about 21 months (moves against this market, correlation 0.60). Shown shifted forward 21 months so its turns line up with the market's.
Why We Think This
Current Inventory Snapshot
Comparable Markets
| Market | Undervaluation | Appreciation | Liquidity |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW 1M Coupe (E82) | 17 | 68 | 61 |
| Nissan 350Z | 43 | 68 | 50 |
| Nissan 350Z NISMO | 29 | 55 | 57 |
| Nissan 370Z | 50 | 45 | 50 |
| Alfa Romeo 4C | 54 | 40 | 45 |
| Fiat 500 (2012-2019) | 36 | 58 | 45 |
| Porsche 718 Boxster/Cayman | 44 | 37 | 36 |
| Porsche 718 Boxster/Cayman GT4 | 17 | 38 | 30 |
Recent Signals & Alerts
- vin returned higher VIN relisted +$48,932 vs prior
- vin returned higher VIN relisted +$49,732 vs prior
- vin returned higher VIN relisted +$48,932 vs prior
- vin returned higher VIN relisted +$48,932 vs prior
- vin returned higher VIN relisted +$49,732 vs prior
- vin returned higher VIN relisted +$49,732 vs prior
Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.