Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28

CAMARO 1ST GEN Z28 CARSTOCKSPECIALTY
$97.0K ▲ $4.6K (+5.0%)12 mo
WATCHWell-supported value — but volatile.
Well supported · 215 sold + 133 active
Fair value$97.0K ($85.4K–$109K)
Typical ask$92.0K
Recent sold$96.8K
Current valueHigh
12-mo trendRoughly flat · 5-in-10 up · 55% calls right
Buyer: Anchor offers to recent sold comps ($97k).
Seller: Price near recent sold comps ($97k); expect negotiation.
Watcher: Volatile — wait for a clearer trend.
💰 Pricing your car to sell
Quick sale$85.4Ksells fast
Fair$96.8Krecent comps
List$104Kroom to negotiate
Stretch$126Kexceptional
🎯 Buying guide
Strong deal below $85.4K · Fair $85.4K–$109K · careful above $126K

The market for 1967-1969 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28s exhibits a notable overvaluation score of 73.49, with high confidence at 0.935. Forward indicators suggest a modest downward direction with probabilities of 0.52 over 6 months and 0.51 over both 12 and 24 months, operating within a volatile regime; the High-Yield Bond Spread is a strong leading indicator for this market, showing a correlation of 0.72 with an 11-month lead.

What It's Actually Worth

Blended value of a standard 56 yr, 35k mi example, ~$97.0K now. The green line weighs confirmed auction sales most heavily (the amber dots — what cars actually hammered for), blends in fast-selling "just-missed" listings, and lightly smooths out month-to-month composition noise.

2007-03 2026-10 $177K $22.8K
━ blended true value ● confirmed auction sales (dot size = volume)
◫ 1140 confirmed auction sales·236 months tracked·since 2007-03·123 active listings

Did our model work? 55% direction calls right

Each faint amber line is a forecast we would have made at that point in the past (12-mo horizon), drawn against what actually happened (blue). Over 137 scored forecasts: 55% got the direction right, median value error ±22%.

2006-08 2026-10 $212K $29.5K
━ actual ╱ past predictions (ghosts)

Walk-forward: each ghost uses only data available at that date — no hindsight. Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.

Where We Think It's Headed

Probability and range, not a single number. Wider = less certain (not bigger gains).

2007-03 now +24mo $418K $17.7K
HorizonDirectionProbabilityConfidencePast accuracy
6 mo DOWN 52% Low 59%
12 mo DOWN 51% Low 55%
24 mo DOWN 51% Low 45%

Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.

Lead Indicator Forecast

Some indicators move before this market does. High-Yield Bond Spread has historically led it by about 11 months — so its recent move implies where prices head next (dashed). The solid green line is actual value through today; the shaded path is what the lead implies.

$97.5K now +11mo 2007-03 $111K $41.3K
BECAUSE credit spreads rose 12%. THEREFORE, given its usual 11-month head start, we expect little change — about +0% (≈ +$458) over the next 11 months. Confidence: Moderate (correlation +0.72, 19 months overlap).

Crystal Ball — What Leading Indicators Signal

Distinct from the trend forecast above: this blends all 8 leading indicators (each at its own lead time, de-duplicated so correlated ones don't double-count) into one signal. Leading indicators are collectively signaling higher over the next ~12 months (moderate conviction — 46% of weighted drivers agree), driven mainly by Nasdaq Composite and Unemployment Rate, though Nasdaq Composite points the other way.

⚠ The price trend and leading indicators disagree — momentum may be running ahead of the fundamentals.
now +12mo (indicators) $130K $41.3K

Are the indicators agreeing?

Each bar is one driver's current push; longer = more weight. All one side = high conviction; split = low.

Nasdaq Composite-0.4Unemployment Rate+0.1Ethereum (USD)-1.1Effective Fed Funds +0.6M2 Money Supply+1.7LVMH (luxury proxy A+0.6Trade-Weighted Dolla+0.9WTI Crude Oil+0.9 ← bearish bullish →

If You’d Bought in 2007

$100K invested 2007-03 → today (19.6 yrs), this car vs where else you could've put the money. Rebased to 100 at the start; the dashed line is inflation (break-even).

$122K$770K$618K$928K$185K 2007 2026 1814 100
━ This car $122K━ S&P 500 $770K━ Gold $618K━ Luxury $928K━ Housing $185K
Lost ground to inflation. The Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28 roughly 1.2×'d your money (a real 26% LOSS to inflation). It LAGGED the stock market by about 84% — the same money in the S&P 500 would be larger. It trailed housing (-34%). (Price only — a real round-trip also loses ~10–20% to buy/sell fees and carrying costs.)
📷 Share this comparison →

What This Market Follows

Specialty-car prices don't move in a vacuum. These economic indicators have historically led this market — tap one to see it shifted forward by its lead time, overlaid on the value line.

High-Yield Bond Spread leads by about 11 months (moves with this market, correlation 0.72). Shown shifted forward 11 months so its turns line up with the market's.

━ Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28 ┄ High-Yield Bond Spread, shifted +11mo
2024-02 2026-10

Why We Think This

Appreciation Momentum
49
Undervaluation
47
Liquidity
52
Speculation Opportunity
49
Depreciation Risk
49
Overvaluation
56
asking +36% vs historic sold asking vs historic spread
inventory -0% inventory trend slope
sell-through 72% sell through rate
asking trend -0.0%/mo median asking trend slope
new-listing velocity 8% of active new listing velocity
69 days on market median days on market
1% relisted listing reappearance rate

Current Inventory Snapshot

Active priced listings123
Median fair value$58,933
Avg deal score44/100

Comparable Markets

MarketUndervaluationAppreciationLiquidity
Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) SS 564035

Recent Signals & Alerts

Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.