Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28

CAMARO 1ST GEN Z28 CARSTOCKSPECIALTY
$96.4K ▲ $3.8K (+4.1%)12 mo
WATCHPriced above trend — but volatile.
Well supported · 201 sold + 118 active
Fair value$96.4K ($84.9K–$108K)
Typical ask$89.7K
Recent sold$95.0K
Current valueHigh
12-mo trendRoughly flat · 5-in-10 up · 56% calls right
Buyer: Anchor offers to recent sold comps ($95k).
Seller: Price near recent sold comps ($95k); expect negotiation.
Watcher: Volatile — wait for a clearer trend.
💰 Pricing your car to sell
Quick sale$84.9Ksells fast
Fair$95.0Krecent comps
List$102Kroom to negotiate
Stretch$120Kexceptional
🎯 Buying guide
Strong deal below $84.9K · Fair $84.9K–$108K · careful above $120K

For the Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28 market, analysis shows high overvaluation at 66.97, with appreciation momentum at 53.83 and depreciation risk at 47.94. A high-confidence read of 0.935 suggests a 0.52 probability of a 'down' direction in the next 6 months, shifting to 'up' directions with 0.49 probability at 12 months and 0.5 probability at 24 months, all within a volatile regime. The High-Yield Bond Spread is the strongest leading indicator, correlating at 0.65 with a 10-month lead.

What It's Actually Worth

Blended value of a standard 56 yr, 34k mi example, ~$96.4K now. The green line weighs confirmed auction sales most heavily (the amber dots — what cars actually hammered for), blends in fast-selling "just-missed" listings, and lightly smooths out month-to-month composition noise.

2007-03 2026-09 $173K $22.8K
━ blended true value ● confirmed auction sales (dot size = volume)
◫ 1114 confirmed auction sales·235 months tracked·since 2007-03·128 active listings

Did our model work? 56% direction calls right

Each faint amber line is a forecast we would have made at that point in the past (12-mo horizon), drawn against what actually happened (blue). Over 135 scored forecasts: 56% got the direction right, median value error ±23%.

2006-08 2026-08 $233K $32.4K
━ actual ╱ past predictions (ghosts)

Walk-forward: each ghost uses only data available at that date — no hindsight. Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.

Where We Think It's Headed

Probability and range, not a single number. Wider = less certain (not bigger gains).

2007-03 now +24mo $578K $27.9K
HorizonDirectionProbabilityConfidencePast accuracy
6 mo DOWN 52% Low 60%
12 mo UP 49% Low 56%
24 mo UP 50% Low 45%

Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.

Lead Indicator Forecast

Some indicators move before this market does. High-Yield Bond Spread has historically led it by about 10 months — so its recent move implies where prices head next (dashed). The solid green line is actual value through today; the shaded path is what the lead implies.

$95.3K now +10mo 2007-03 $111K $41.3K
BECAUSE credit spreads fell 9%. THEREFORE, given its usual 10-month head start, we lean DOWN — about −1% (≈ −$1,091) over the next 10 months. Confidence: Moderate (correlation +0.57, 18 months overlap).

Crystal Ball — What Leading Indicators Signal

Distinct from the trend forecast above: this blends all 8 leading indicators (each at its own lead time, de-duplicated so correlated ones don't double-count) into one signal. Leading indicators are collectively signaling higher over the next ~12 months (moderate conviction — 44% of weighted drivers agree), driven mainly by Ethereum (USD) and Nasdaq Composite, though Ethereum (USD) points the other way.

Trend and leading indicators agree — both point up. Higher-conviction read.
now +12mo (indicators) $127K $41.3K

Are the indicators agreeing?

Each bar is one driver's current push; longer = more weight. All one side = high conviction; split = low.

Ethereum (USD)-1.4Nasdaq Composite-0.6Unemployment Rate+0.1High-Yield Bond Spre+0.1Effective Fed Funds +0.6M2 Money Supply+1.7LVMH (luxury proxy A+0.3Housing Starts+0.9 ← bearish bullish →

If You’d Bought in 2007

$100K invested 2007-03 → today (19.5 yrs), this car vs where else you could've put the money. Rebased to 100 at the start; the dashed line is inflation (break-even).

$117K$766K$666K$1123K$185K 2007 2026 1814 100
━ This car $117K━ S&P 500 $766K━ Gold $666K━ Luxury $1123K━ Housing $185K
Lost ground to inflation. The Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28 roughly 1.2×'d your money (a real 28% LOSS to inflation). It LAGGED the stock market by about 85% — the same money in the S&P 500 would be larger. It trailed housing (-37%). (Price only — a real round-trip also loses ~10–20% to buy/sell fees and carrying costs.)
📷 Share this comparison →

What This Market Follows

Specialty-car prices don't move in a vacuum. These economic indicators have historically led this market — tap one to see it shifted forward by its lead time, overlaid on the value line.

High-Yield Bond Spread leads by about 10 months (moves with this market, correlation 0.57). Shown shifted forward 10 months so its turns line up with the market's.

━ Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) Z/28 ┄ High-Yield Bond Spread, shifted +10mo
2024-01 2026-09

Why We Think This

Appreciation Momentum
51
Undervaluation
45
Liquidity
55
Speculation Opportunity
50
Depreciation Risk
49
Overvaluation
64
asking +36% vs historic sold asking vs historic spread
inventory -0% inventory trend slope
sell-through 74% sell through rate
asking trend -0.1%/mo median asking trend slope
new-listing velocity 20% of active new listing velocity
99 days on market median days on market
2% relisted listing reappearance rate

Current Inventory Snapshot

Active priced listings128
Median fair value$58,477
Avg deal score46/100

Comparable Markets

MarketUndervaluationAppreciationLiquidity
Chevrolet Camaro (1967-1969) SS 445745

Recent Signals & Alerts

Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.