Porsche 911 GT3 (991) GT3 RS

991 911 GT3 RS CARSTOCKSPECIALTY
$219K ▲ $8.1K (+3.8%)12 mo
BUYER ADVANTAGEAsks running above recent sales — but volatile.
Well supported · 72 sold + 213 active
Fair value$219K ($193K–$246K)
Typical ask$265K
Recent sold$216K
Current valueHigh
12-mo trendRoughly flat · 5-in-10 up · 60% calls right
Buyer: Negotiate from recent sold comps ($216k), not asking prices ($265k).
Seller: Asks are aggressive vs sold — strong/low-mile cars can ask high, average cars may sit.
Watcher: Volatile — wait for a clearer trend.
💰 Pricing your car to sell
Quick sale$193Ksells fast
Fair$216Krecent comps
List$231Kroom to negotiate
Stretch$290Kexceptional
🎯 Buying guide
Strong deal below $193K · Fair $193K–$246K · careful above $290K

The Porsche 911 GT3 (991) GT3 RS market shows an overvaluation score of 55.71 and an appreciation momentum of 55.5, with a depreciation risk score of 39.38. Forecasts, supported by a confidence of 0.935, indicate a generally 'up' direction with probabilities ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 over the next 6 to 24 months, all within a volatile regime. The High-Yield Bond Spread is a leading indicator with a correlation of 0.59 over 22 months.

What It's Actually Worth

Blended value of a standard 7 yr, 7k mi example, ~$219K now. The green line weighs confirmed auction sales most heavily (the amber dots — what cars actually hammered for), blends in fast-selling "just-missed" listings, and lightly smooths out month-to-month composition noise.

2018-08 2026-09 $362K $140K
━ blended true value ● confirmed auction sales (dot size = volume)
◫ 252 confirmed auction sales·98 months tracked·since 2018-08·247 active listings

Did our model work? 60% direction calls right

Each faint amber line is a forecast we would have made at that point in the past (12-mo horizon), drawn against what actually happened (blue). Over 45 scored forecasts: 60% got the direction right, median value error ±12%.

2018-01 2026-09 $346K $152K
━ actual ╱ past predictions (ghosts)

Walk-forward: each ghost uses only data available at that date — no hindsight. Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.

Where We Think It's Headed

Probability and range, not a single number. Wider = less certain (not bigger gains).

2018-08 now +24mo $560K $128K
HorizonDirectionProbabilityConfidencePast accuracy
6 mo UP 49% Low 51%
12 mo UP 51% Low 60%
24 mo UP 53% Low 58%

Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.

Lead Indicator Forecast

Some indicators move before this market does. Trade-Weighted Dollar Index has historically led it by about 4 months — so its recent move implies where prices head next (dashed). The solid green line is actual value through today; the shaded path is what the lead implies.

$220K now +4mo 2018-08 $266K $195K
BECAUSE the US dollar held roughly flat. THEREFORE, given its usual 4-month head start, we expect little change — about +0% (≈ +$625) over the next 4 months. Confidence: High (correlation +0.55, 46 months overlap).

Crystal Ball — What Leading Indicators Signal

Distinct from the trend forecast above: this blends all 8 leading indicators (each at its own lead time, de-duplicated so correlated ones don't double-count) into one signal. Leading indicators are collectively signaling lower over the next ~12 months (low conviction — 31% of weighted drivers agree), driven mainly by Trade-Weighted Dollar Index and LVMH (luxury proxy ADR), though WTI Crude Oil points the other way.

⚠ The price trend and leading indicators disagree — momentum may be running ahead of the fundamentals.
now +12mo (indicators) $266K $170K

Are the indicators agreeing?

Each bar is one driver's current push; longer = more weight. All one side = high conviction; split = low.

Trade-Weighted Dolla-1.1LVMH (luxury proxy A-1.9US Metro Mean Temper-0.7WTI Crude Oil+0.0VIX Volatility Index-1.2Case-Shiller Home P+0.010-Year Treasury Yie-0.4Personal Savings Rat+0.4 ← bearish bullish →

If You’d Bought in 2018

$100K invested 2018-08 → today (8.1 yrs), this car vs where else you could've put the money. Rebased to 100 at the start; the dashed line is inflation (break-even).

$82.2K$306K$368K$203K$164K 2018 2026 436 100
━ This car $82.2K━ S&P 500 $306K━ Gold $368K━ Luxury $203K━ Housing $164K₿ Bitcoin ×11 (off-scale)
Lost ground to inflation. The Porsche 911 GT3 (991) GT3 RS roughly 0.8×'d your money (a real 38% LOSS to inflation). It LAGGED the stock market by about 73% — the same money in the S&P 500 would be larger. It trailed housing (-50%). (Price only — a real round-trip also loses ~10–20% to buy/sell fees and carrying costs.)
📷 Share this comparison →

What This Market Follows

Specialty-car prices don't move in a vacuum. These economic indicators have historically led this market — tap one to see it shifted forward by its lead time, overlaid on the value line.

High-Yield Bond Spread leads by about 23 months (moves with this market, correlation 0.57). Shown shifted forward 23 months so its turns line up with the market's.

━ Porsche 911 GT3 (991) GT3 RS ┄ High-Yield Bond Spread, shifted +23mo
2025-02 2026-09

Why We Think This

Appreciation Momentum
56
Undervaluation
44
Liquidity
52
Speculation Opportunity
49
Depreciation Risk
40
Overvaluation
55
asking +56% vs historic sold asking vs historic spread
inventory -0% inventory trend slope
sell-through 77% sell through rate
asking trend +0.1%/mo median asking trend slope
sale prices -0.7%/mo median sale trend slope
43% relisted listing reappearance rate
32 days on market median days on market
5% of listings cutting price price drop frequency

Current Inventory Snapshot

Active priced listings247
Median fair value$199,825
Avg deal score45/100

Recent Signals & Alerts

Data-backed market intelligence, not a guaranteed prediction. Figures are modeled estimates from asking prices, sold comps, and public economic indicators; they can be wrong. Not financial advice.